A weet – wet
B draigl't – draggled
C gin – if, should
D cry – call out [for help]
E warl – world
F ken – know
G ain – own
B draigl't – draggled
C gin – if, should
D cry – call out [for help]
E warl – world
F ken – know
G ain – own
Though many versions of this poem exist (and ones from more reputable sources), I decided to include this version because it seems to contain the most of the motifs of the different versions, as well as the notes on the Scottish words ("ilka" means "every"). If you would prefer to read a translated version, you can access that here: http://www.thehypertexts.com/Robert%20Burns%20Translations%20Modern%20English.htm . In addition, here is a link to a recording of the song, sung by Marian Anderson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfNuSPSEmlo . The notion presented by the announcer that the "rye" referred to is a river is erroneous.
Where this gets interesting is when one compares it to Salinger. The poem and song deal with a romantic encounter while "comin thro' the rye." This theme is repeated in several other places, through the glen, and through the grain. The narrator bemoans that he or she does not have a "lassie" or "laddie," but the rest of the people still are kind to the narrator. That the narrator is alone in their lack of a companion is a weak parallel to the separation and disillusionment Holden feels toward general society, and is a parallel to his solitude. It is likely not possible to know whether or not Salinger intended this. It is also important to note that, of the many versions of the song, some emphasize the romantic aspect of it, to the point of adding implicitly sexual elements. This is an interesting comparison to Holden's glorification of childlike simplicity. Whatever, if anything, Salinger was trying to allude to with his selection of this poem/song, we will probably never know. However, I think it is very significant that it is traditionally a children's song, considering the importance of childhood in the novel. As to Holden's view of the poem, that it is so bizarre and based on a misquote makes me suspect that Salinger himself had a similar reading of it from his younger years.
This is really interesting. I liked your idea that Salinger was basing Holden's version of the poem off of one that he had known as a child, but it's also interesting to think about Holden crafting a scenario that sums up his entire world view based on a misquote of one of many versions of the song
ReplyDeleteReally interesting idea. Could it be that Salinger is alluding to some idea that what Holden really is searching for is a romantic interest that shares his ideas? He breaks up with Sally after she makes it clear she doesn't agree with him, could that be what would make him try at school? I guess we will never know. Well written.
ReplyDeleteIt's not clear whether it's Holden or the little kid who misquotes the poem (although good old Phoebe gets it right!). But the difference between "catching" and "meeting" seems relevant to Holden's dilemma: what he wants to do is halt the progress of time, to stop a natural process from occurring, to "catch a body" in motion and stop it. "Meeting" has a much different implication (aside from the romantic implications in the Burns poem), a more neutral and mutual engagement between two interested parties, rather than one "saving" the other. One way to read the ending, perhaps, is that Holden is more willing to "meet" Phoebe where she's at than to try to "catch" her--letting her reach for the brass ring, whether or not she falls.
ReplyDelete