In "Brad Carrigan, American," Saunders makes fun of American television programming, with its increasingly stupid and mean qualities, especially reality television and sitcoms, while also proving important points about these shows' impacts on society. The most important of television programs for this is the news, which shows petty fashion trends in the US and suffering around the globe to reinforce American pride and contentment. "In Persuasion Nation," deals with the increased commercialism in American culture, as well as the increasing violence and absurdity in commercials. This is very important when applied to American culture, and their mutual influences. The violence depicted is somewhat akin to Candide, though the latter is completely based in our world, not a fictional commercial or television world we view.
Voltaire makes many of the same critiques Saunders does, for one, that we need more compassion, but also that it is imperative that we try to understand what is happening around the world, and to know the world. While the end of Candide calls for this, as well as simplicity for happy living, this idea seems present in Saunders' work, for example, with Timmy and the gameboy. Voltaire wants us to know the world, and Saunders wants to make it better. In this way the authors have similar, but slightly different aims. However, I still think they are connected, and I do not believe it was an accident that Voltaire himself is a character in "In Persuasion Nation," but perhaps a nod from one great satirist to another.
I have not read Candide by Voltaire, but I do agree that through Saunder's satire, he may be trying to get us to think in a way that is independent of the "ridiculous" things that commercialism is trying to persuade us of, to be autonomous beings capable of independent thought.
ReplyDeleteI think this is a strong connection to make between Saunders and Voltaire, as the way you describe Voltaire's writing and Candide, it appears in a very similar light to how Saunders depicts and critiques modern day commercials. As you point out, Saunders goes into depth into certain aspects of commercials, such as the excessive violence and importantly the lack of sympathy that is growing, and if Voltaire's work functions in a similar way for the concepts and philosophies popular during that time period, I'm sure it would be worth the read, if not for the book itself but also for the connections you point out to Saunders.
ReplyDeleteThere's an interesting contrast between the objects of Voltaire and Saunders's satire, however: Saunders is attacking aspects of popular/advertising-driven culture that seem to lionize pessimism and self-interest as core values--get what you want, and screw whoever is in your way. Where Voltaire sees a fatal lack of irony in Leibniz, Saunders addresses the contemporary pervasive irony, where sincerity seems "weak" and "not funny," and where offensive, obnoxious, narcissistic humnor reigns, with the ability to put down anything sincere as needing to "lighten up." There's a peculiar effect here, as his own stories are very very funny, and very ironic--even as they satirize irony and humor.
ReplyDelete